- 
							
							
							
								Hi,
 the HELP with FEFLOW says:
 
 [i]The Direct solution strategy provides the advantage of an exact solution of the equation system without any residual error due to a solver iteration. This might come at the expense of longer runtimes and higher memory demand, depending on problem setup and available hardware.[/i]
 
 But when I choose direct solvers, I got the following info:
 
 No convergence in iteration loop at time: 1.000000e-03 with remaining error: 2.990310e+06 greater than  1.000000e-03
 
 it is contradictory. Any comments and help are appreciated.
 
 Quinn
 
 
- 
							
							
							
								Hi,
 
 When I used "Measure" to measure the distance between two points, very often an error message appeared:
 
 Math: Argument domain error in function sqrt!
 
 Any comments?
 
 Thanks,
 
 Quinn
 
- 
							
							
							
								Hi Carlos,
 
 When do you think the revised/upgraded version 6.2 could be issued?
 
 Thanks,
 
 Quinn
 
- 
							
							
							
								Hi,
 
 I am creating a 2D vertical planar steady state flow model.
 
 Problem 1:
 I tried to assign seepage face to a boundary. I double clicked on "hydraulic head-BC", selected several nodes by double clicking "seepage face_upper" under Node Selection, chose "seepage face", and clicked on the check mark.
 
 An window popped up, saying:
 
 [b]Max. flow-rate constrained cannot be displayed for Domain/seepage face_upper/Node Slice Intersection. Please select at least one compatible spatial unit before adding a data or map source to a view.[/b]
 
 But the view window still shows the seepage face. I checked the seepage face using Inspector, and things seems fine.
 
 But when I selected the same node manually (not by double clicking "seepage face_upper" under Node Selection), everything worked fine.
 
 Problem 2:
 Another problem then came. When I chose the same nodes, and clicked on the cross mark, I cannot deleted these seepage face BC (when Seepage Face shown in the Editor tool bar); An error window popped up, saying "[b]invalid pointer[/b]"! Why?
 
 I never had this problem with FEFLOW 6.1.
 
 Thanks for help.
 
 Quinn
 
- 
							
							
							
								Hi Carlos,
 
 I just downloaded FePEST from online, which is version 6.2.2.987. In terms of license, I can use FEFLOW, and I think I should be able to use FePEST, right?
 
 Thanks,
 
 Quinn
 
- 
							
							
							
								Hi,
 
 I launched Parameter Estimation, clicked on "New", and selected a .fem file from the tutorial folder, and tried to open it. And then a popup window said "not licensed". Do I need a separate license for FePest?
 
 Thanks,
 
 Quinn
 
- 
							
							
							
								Hi,
 
 For the first time I run parameter estimation, I was asked to give the directories to all the executables under tools>options. I just found fePEST.exe. where can I find the rest?
 
 Thanks,
 
 Quinn
 
- 
							
							
							
								Hi,
 
 When I opened a model developed in FEFLOW 6.1, the base map I used in FEFLOW 6.1 (which appeared in the back in FEFLOW 6.1) comes to the front. It is totally opacity, and I cannot see the mesh. I tried to adjust the transparency, and it does not work. How to put the base map in the back so that I can see the mesh? Any help is appreciated.
 
 Quinn
 
- 
							
							
							
								Hi,
 
 FEFLOW includes solver for symmetric and nonsymmetric system. But how do you know if your system is symmetric or nonsymmetric?
 
 Thanks,
 
 Quinn
 
- 
							
							
							
								 I used seepage face to simulate dewatering wells in a 3D model with 9 layers. I re-run this .fem file recently, but cannot get the same .dac file as I got before (very strange!!!). The pumping rate from the seepage face were reasonable from my previous .dac file. But the .dac file I got this time shows a unreasonably large value and variation in pumping rate. I am thinking to re-create the .fem file from the previous .dac file. But is it possible?
 
 Thanks for help.
 
 Quinn