adacovsk

Hi,

I am wonder how I would go about measuring where streamlines terminate. I believe there's a feature in MODFLOW that tracks this information.

Thanks,

Adam

No, I'm not sure the capabilities of ArcView, but you'll need to use lines (aka polylines) instead of polygons.

Use polylines, not polygons. The polygon represents your entire model area.

That's normal

Hi, any release notes for p10?

Ahh, adding a Nodal Expression represent time-varying material properties sounds perfect! Clever workaround!

Hi,

I have a bunch of timeseries representing recharge across my model domain... However, I don't know if it's working properly since it doesn't show any information on whether it's been assigned the timeseries properly. I think this is a new feature; I believe we've normally used flux boundary conditions to represent recharge previously, but I like these in/outflow conditions more. Does it work and am I doing something wrong?

Thanks,

Adam

Hi Björn, thanks for the suggestion, it's very clever! Never thought to scale by -1 and/or offset it!

Everything seems to be working, with a few minor hiccups. It seems that I am limited to a constraint of ~1e-8 for the flux and not smaller (really tiny model!). Also, I need to make 4 character names for the parameters or else scaling by -1 doesn't work? Might just be the delimiting causing an minor issue, oh well!

Thanks,

Adam

Hi!

So I am trying to estimate my flow flux boundary conditions via FePEST... I have flow going into the model and flow going out of the model and solving the inverse problem. However, since there is flux in/out we have negative values being written to the fpi file... I am thinking that negative values for ifm-implemented parameters in FePEST cannot be handled? I am using relative change limit. I'm not too good with this, so I don't know if it is a bug or my limited knowledge. :^)

Thanks,

Adam

I contacted support regarding this a few days ago, the response from Björn was "the new patch only contains some bug fixes. The are no specific note we published. Patch 9 does not contain new developments"... Not sure why they aren't publishing the bug fixes any longer, I find bug patch notes pretty important still.

Adam