Posted Tue, 12 Sep 2017 00:53:26 GMT by Alex Costall PhD Student
Hi all,

I'm trying to model a shallow unconfined aquifer with FEFlow, in Planar 2D. The mean-sea level is at 0, and there's approximately 30 meters of unsaturated aquifer above.

Using the Standard (saturated) flow equation doesn't make sense to me, given the unconfined (and unsaturated) portion of the aquifer.

Do I need to use Richards Equations to accurately model this situation, or are there settings I can use to better represent this with standard flow equation?

Cheers,
Posted Tue, 12 Sep 2017 08:07:39 GMT by Björn Kaiser
For me it seems solving the Richards equation is the way to go.
Posted Wed, 13 Sep 2017 01:52:35 GMT by Alex Costall PhD Student
Thanks Bjorn - Could you elaborate why, from a professionals point-of-view? I need to convince my colleagues why it's a better idea, and I'm not certain of the correct theory to apply..
Posted Wed, 13 Sep 2017 06:23:37 GMT by Björn Kaiser
In a 3D model with uncofined conditions, you have the option of using a simplified approach to represent the unsaturated zone (e.g. phreatic). This option is not provided in 2D vertical models. In 2D vertical models you may either solve the saturated Darcy equation or Richards. If you have an unsaturated zone, then Richard seems to me the better option.

You must be signed in to post in this forum.