Perl Shaw

Thanks for your answer. Actually I am confused that how data from multiple wells be loaded. Do you mean that each ID will represent the WELL such that:

# ID1 for Well 1
! Comment line for time series 1
! ...
x1 y1
x2 y2
...
xm ym
END
# ID2  for Well 2
! Comment line for time series 2
! ...
x1 y1
x2 y2
...
xn yn
END
# IDn
! Comment line for time series n
! ...
x1 y1
x2 y2
...
xo yo
END
END

If this is the case then how Wells will be linked in the Transient model?

How Super-mesh be generated from the Shape-file in FeFlow 5.1? Digitization cannot give 100% results. Can we convert shape-file to Super-mesh element using FeFlow 5.1?

I have Transient Data ((Time, Hydraulic Heads) of 100 wells for 5 years. I want to input it into FeFlow (Version 5.1)  for running Transient Model.

YEAR  WELL      HEAD
2001  Well#1  250.01 
2001  Well#2  250.03 
2001  Well#3  250.02 

2002  Well#1  240.01 
2002  Well#2  239.02 
2002  Well#3  242.03 

-----    ---------  --------
-----    ---------  --------

How this data can be input to FeFlow? I want to know file format and structure of that file.

I have River on one side of my model area while an irrigation canal on other side.

Which Boundary Conditions are represented by Rivers and Canal in this case?

How the Aquifer RECHARGE values are assigned in FeFlow, whether using the material property "In/out flow on top/bottom" or Source(+)/Sink(-) option? What is the basic difference between these two options?

I have Transient Data ((Time, Hydraulic Heads) of 100 wells for 5 years. I want to input it into FeFlow (Version 5.1) using *.pow file for running Transient Model. I tried to make the pow file as given below. My questions are:

1. How can it be input to FeFlow?

2. What these Numbers (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5) are showing?  Is this #1, #2 .... shows the number of wells?

3. How the data of 50 wells will be incorporated in the pow file?

4. Since pow file only take time and heads, how this data will be linked with wells (No X/Y etc.)?

#1
0  100
30  103
60  106
--  ---
--  ---
365 112
END
#2
0  100
30  103
60  106
--  ---
--  ---
365 112
END
#3
0  100
30  103
60  106
--  ---
--  ---
365 112
END
#4
0  100
30  103
60  106
--  ---
--  ---
365 112
END
#5
0  100
30  103
60  106
--  ---
--  ---
365 112
END
END

Can anybody let me know which interpolation technique (Kriging, Akima or Inverse Distance Weighting) is better to interpolate following data in GW Flow Modeling using FeFlow:

1. Depth of Aquifer
2. Hydraulic Elevations or Water Table

After running GW Flow Model in FeFlow, it gives Flow lines as output. Can we draw equipotential lines on it using FeFlow 5.1? Is there any option available in FeFlow to display equipotential lines along with flow lines?