Hi,
I am trying to simulate a situation where a culvert goes under (through) a built-up road, but where no defined channels exist in the area. (i.e. the road runs through a wetland.) I want to know where water is ponding up behind the road (calculated with the overland flow processes) and if I can solve that problem using a culvert.
Therefore, I've run the MIKE SHE model with no link to a MIKE 11 model to determine a baseline condition of where ponded water occurs.
I now want to use MIKE 11 to determine the volume of water that would flow through a culvert under the road at those locations. So, I want the ponded water to flow from the MIKE SHE model into the MIKE 11 model upstream of the road, flow through the structure (culvert) under the road, and then flow from the MIKE 11 model back into the MIKE SHE model downstream of the the road, so that MIKE SHE can inform me where the water then flows due to overland processes, and if the culvert indeed solves the problem.
Is this possible? It seems that using the overbank spilling option should allow this to occur. Here's what is not clear to me from the documentation:
1. can I put in a short MIKE 11 channel in the middle of my model domain that connects two "low" spots in the MIKE SHE model?
2. what should the boundary conditions be on the ends of the MIKE 11 channel for this to occur? Right now I've assumed two "closed" channel ends.
3. can overbank spilling be used to essentially "empty" the MIKE 11 channel back into the MIKE SHE model in this situation?
Thank you for any clarification you can provide on overbank spilling and the ability to put in a short MIKE 11 channel to connect areas of lower topography!
Janna