well BC problem

I think I meet exactly the same problem as described in this old topic : <http://feflow.info/forum/index.php/topic,107.msg241.html#msg241> Do you remember what was wrong in Colin Smith's model?
Thanks for your help,
CS

I cannot recall the solution in 2006, but I would think the most likely reason is that wells have been added or removed in between. FEFLOW always keeps a consistant numbering of the wells, so when the total number changes, the individual well numbers might change, too.