Posted Mon, 01 Oct 2012 09:48:35 GMT by Søren Erbs Poulsen

The bulk thermal conductivity in FEFLOW is, to my knowledge, calculated as the porosity-weighted average of the fluid and solid conductivities. However, in some cases the geometric mean is preferable (for example for thermal conduction in limestones in Denmark). Will you include such an option at some point or perhaps give control over this in the API?

Best regards,
Posted Tue, 02 Oct 2012 08:11:33 GMT by Denim Umeshkumar Anajwala
We currently do not have plans to extend the current options here. You may find a solution by modifying either solid or fluid conductivities (or both) accordingly via a plug-in.

You must be signed in to post in this forum.